What is needed to pass 922-101 exam?

922-101 reading practice test | 922-101 practice exam | 922-101 exam questions | 922-101 pass marks | 922-101 exam test - bigdiscountsales.com

922-101 - Communication Server 1000 Linux Platform Architecture - Dump Information

Vendor	:	Nortel
Exam Code	:	922-101
Exam Name	:	Communication Server 1000 Linux Platform Architecture
Questions and Answers	:	110 Q & A
Updated On	:	November 17, 2017
PDF Download Mirror	:	922-101 Brain Dump
Get Full Version	:	Pass4sure 922-101 Full Version

Real 922-101 questions that appeared in test today

If you are searching for 922-101 Practice Test containing Real Test Questions, you are at correct place. Killexams.com have aggregated database of questions from Actual Exams keeping in mind the end goal to enable you to plan and pass your exam on the main endeavor. All preparation materials on the site are Up To Date and checked by our specialists.

Killexams.com give most recent and updated Pass4sure Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for new syllabus of Nortel 922-101 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and Answers to Improve your insight and pass your exam with High Marks. We guarantee your achievement in the Test Center, covering every one of the subjects of exam and fabricate your Knowledge of the 922-101 exam. Pass without any doubt with our exact questions.

Our 922-101 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps checked and confirmed including references and clarifications (where material). Our objective to collect the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first endeavor however Really Improve Your Knowledge about the 922-101 exam points.

922-101 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in High Quality Study Guide that you can download in your Computer or some other gadget and begin setting up your 922-101 exam. Print Complete 922-101 Study Guide, convey with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and Enjoy your Exam Prep. You can get to updated 922-101 Exam Q&A from your online record whenever.

Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
NOVSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

Download your Communication Server 1000 Linux Platform Architecture Study Guide promptly in the wake of purchasing and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep Right Now!

922-101 Discount Coupon, 922-101 Promo Code, 922-101 vce, Free 922-101 vce, Download Free 922-101 dumps, Free 922-101 braindumps, pass4sure 922-101, 922-101 practice test, 922-101 practice exam, killexams.com 922-101, 922-101 real questions, 922-101 actual test, 922-101 PDF download, Pass4sure 922-101 Download, 922-101 help, 922-101 examcollection, Passleader 922-101, exam-labs 922-101, Justcertify 922-101, certqueen 922-101, 922-101 testking

View Full Exam »

Are there authentic resources for 922-101 study guides?

killexams.com has pinnacle merchandise for college students due to the fact those are designed for those students who are interested in the training of 922-101 certification. It turned into first-rate selection due to the fact 922-101 exam engine has extremely good take a look at contents that are easy to recognize in brief time frame. i'm grateful to the brilliant crewbecause this helped me in my career development. It helped me to understand a way to solution all vital questions to get most scores. It turned into top notch decision that made me fan of killexams. i've decided to come returned one moretime.

922-101 certification exam is pretty anxious.

I cleared 922-101 examination with high marks. every time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to score greater marks. Its splendid to have help of killexams.com question financial institution for such type of assessments. thanks to all.

Do you need real test questions of 922-101 examination to prepare?

Hurrah! i've surpassed my 922-101 this week. and that i got flying color and for all this i am so grateful to killexams. they have got come up with so appropriate and well-engineered software. Their simulations are very just like the ones in real tests. Simulations are the primary component of 922-101 exam and really worth extra weight age then other questions. After making ready from their program it turned into very smooth for me to remedy all the ones simulations. I used them for all 922-101 examination and located them trustful each time.

I simply experienced 922-101 examination questions, there's not anything like this.

i have currently surpassed the 922-101 examination with this package. this is a notable solution in case you need a quick butdependable practise for 922-101 exam. this is a expert degree, so count on which you still want to spend time gambling with Q&A - practical revel in is prime. yet, as a long way and examination simulations cross, Killexams is the winner. Their trying out engine truely simulates the exam, which includes the specific question sorts. It does make matters simpler, and in my case, I accept as true with it contributed to me getting a 100% score! I couldn't believe my eyes! I knew I did well, but this became a surprise!!

It is great to have 922-101 practice Questions.

The nice guidance i have ever skilled. I took many 922-101 certification tests, but 922-101 became out to be the easiest one thanks to killexams.com. i've recently found this internet site and wish I knew approximately it a few years in the past. might have stored me a number of sleepless nights and gray hair! The 922-101 examination isn't an smooth one, specificallyits cutting-edge version. but the 922-101 Q and A includes the trendy questions, daily updates, and those are without a doubtproper and legitimate questions. Im satisfied this is authentic motive I got maximum of them all through my examination. I were given an extremely good rating and thank killexams.com to making 922-101 examination pressure-loose.

Where can I find free 922-101 exam dumps and questions?

I though that if I should clear our 922-101 take a look at and sure this is once I got here to realize with my old excellent friend that killexams.com is the one that might be the boon for me as it got me my intelligence finally returned which I had lost for some time and i desire that this would by no means get over for me getting my 922-101 take a look at cleared in spite of everything.

Is there a person who surpassed 922-101 examination?

i am penning this because I need yo say thanks to you. i have successfully cleared 922-101 exam with ninety six%. The take a look at bank series made with the aid of your crew is super. It not only offers a actual feel of a web exam but each offerseach query with specified explananation in a easy language which is simple to apprehend. i am greater than glad that I made the proper preference by shopping for your check series.

Nice to hear that braindumps of 922-101 exam are available.

I sought 922-101 help on the internet and found this killexams.com. It gave me a lot of cool stuff to study from for my 922-101 test. Its needless to say that I was able to get through the test without troubles.

in which can i find 922-101 exam look at help?

It become very encourging revel in with killexams.com crew. They informed me to attempt their 922-101 examination questions once and neglect failing the 922-101 exam. First I hesitated to apply the material because I afraid of failing the 922-101 examination. however after I told by using my friends that they used the exam simulator for thier 922-101 certification examination, i bought the coaching p.c.. It became very cheap. That was the primary time that I satisfied to apply killexams.com guidance fabric after I got 100% marks in my 922-101 examination. I in reality respect you killexams.com team.

Really great experience! with 922-101 real test questions.

I passed this examination 922-101 nowadays with a ninety two% score. killexams.com became my major guidance resource, so in case you plan to take this examination, you may totally expect this 922-101 questions supply. All information is applicable, the 922-101 questions are correct. i'm very glad with Killexams.com. that is the primary time I used it, but now Im confident unwell come lower back to this internet site for all my 922-101 certification checks

See more Nortel dumps

920-504 | 920-344 | 920-803 | 920-178 | 920-456 | 920-332 | 920-163 | 920-216 | 920-336 | 920-221 | 920-136 | 922-080 | 920-130 | 922-100 | 920-537 | 920-180 | 922-109 | 920-430 | 920-328 | 920-470 | 920-196 | 920-432 | 920-270 | 920-433 | 920-106 | 920-327 | 920-340 | 922-099 | 920-220 | 920-183 | 920-330 | 920-141 | 920-110 | 920-105 | 920-345 | 920-362 | 920-534 | 920-138 | 920-505 | 920-271 | 920-165 | 920-452 | 920-548 | 920-260 | 920-199 | 920-552 | 920-481 | 922-096 | 922-095 | 920-338 |

Latest Exams added on bigdiscountsales

1Z0-453 | 210-250 | 300-210 | 500-205 | 500-210 | 70-765 | 9A0-409 | C2010-555 | C2090-136 | C9010-260 | C9010-262 | C9020-560 | C9020-568 | C9050-042 | C9050-548 | C9050-549 | C9510-819 | C9520-911 | C9520-923 | C9520-928 | C9520-929 | C9550-512 | CPIM-BSP | C_TADM70_73 | C_TB1200_92 | C_TBW60_74 | C_TPLM22_64 | C_TPLM50_95 | DNDNS-200 | DSDPS-200 | E20-562 | E20-624 | E_HANABW151 | E_HANAINS151 | JN0-1330 | JN0-346 | JN0-661 | MA0-104 | MB2-711 | NSE6 | OMG-OCRES-A300 | P5050-031 |

See more dumps on bigdiscountsales

920-165 | HP0-A116 | A2090-545 | 4A0-105 | 000-M92 | 920-362 | 1Y0-900 | 190-840 | 71-571 | HP0-626 | 1Z1-456 | 9L0-401 | 199-01 | NPTE | HP0-Y26 | A00-280 | NS0-154 | ST0-079 | 650-298 | I10-002 | P2050-028 | NS0-910 | 1Z0-859 | 9A0-351 | HP0-S13 | CCNT | 000-137 | 250-300 | HP2-E58 | HP2-B103 | HP0-W02 | 1Z0-470 | 000-746 | C9030-634 | 310-083 | M8010-663 | 920-463 | M9060-719 | HP0-M16 | EE0-501 | HP0-460 | VCP550 | HP0-D04 | 920-330 | 000-892 | HP2-B62 | 9A0-127 | 000-M41 | 000-436 | HP3-C32 |

922-101 Questions and Answers

A Communication Server (CS) 1000E Rls. 6.0 customer opened a trouble ticket that a newly installed system with SIP Line Gateway cannot place calls to an existing 5.x site. After investigating the problem you isolate the problem to the SIP Line Gateway settings. Which SIP Line Gateway Setting is most likely to block calls between the two sites?

Security Policy - Security Disabled
Security Policy - Best Effort
Security Policy - Secure Local
Security Policy - Secure End-to-End

Answer: D

QUESTION: 30

A customer is planning to deploy a multi-site Communication Server (CS) 1000E network with a UCM Security Domain that includes a Primary Security Server and a Backup Security Server. Which statements regarding the Backup Security Server are true? (Choose two.)

It manages authorization requests when the Primary is not available.
It manages configuration changes when the Primary is not available.
It manages authentication requests when the Primary is not available.
It issues certificates to servers when the Primary is not available.

Answer: AC

QUESTION: 31

A Communication Server (CS) 1000E Rls. 6.0 customer has decided to implement UNIStim security with DTLS. Which statement regarding UNIStim security with DTLS is correct?

It encrypts UNIStim signaling between the Line Terminal Proxy Server and IP telephones.
It provides media security between the IP telephones.
It provides security between the IP telephones and the Call Server.
It is provided by the Secure Multimedia Controller 2450.

Answer: A

QUESTION: 32

A Communication Server (CS) 1000E Rls. 6.0 customer is interested in implementing the Linux security hardening capability. Which statements regarding Linux basic hardening are correct? (Choose two.)

It is turned on by default and cannot be turned off.
It is turned on by default but can be turned off.
It is configured using special command line tools.
It includes all hardening items not affecting the performance of Nortel applications.

Answer: AD

Nortel 922-101 Exam (Communication Server 1000 Linux Platform Architecture) Detailed Information

Nortel Certifications
Nortel Certifications
Nortel delivers an industry-leading global certification programme that sets the standards for designing, installing, and supporting Nortel products and solutions.
Nortel’s Professional Certification Programme provides fast, flexible paths to achieving Nortel Certification, including ‘in class’ segment exams or the ability to complete a certification exam at a Prometric Testing Centre.
Nortel use skills-based exams to test your skills and knowledge, validating your competency on our highly technical products and solutions that encompass Security, Mobility and Mulitmedia Communications.
Nortel Certified Support Specialist (NCSS)
Nortel Certified Support Expert (NCSE)
Nortel Certified Design Specialist (NCDS)
Nortel Certified Design Expert (NCDE)
The Nortel Institute is committed to educating, training, and professional development in the broad and booming field of information technology and telecommunications by developing innovative programs, backed by first-class facilities. The Nortel Institute�s education and training program is designed to respond to current challenges and to anticipate and address future challenges. In additioan, the Institute�s missions in research and development and in strategic analysis enable it to anticipate technological trends and plan training and education programs to prepare people for jobs in new areas.
The Institute designed and obtained approval for the Master of Engineering in Telecommunications program and which began in September 1998. The program graduates 30-35 highly trained experts each year for employment in industry. The Institute offers financial aid to undergraduate and graduate students through the Nortel Institute Scholarship program.
The Institute has also developed training and retraining programs, such as the Executive Development Program, as well as specialized seminars, workshops and forums.
Challenges
The critical shortage of highly qualified personnel in information technology and telecommunications, including researchers, engineers and technological entrepreneurs;
The rapid rate of change in technology requiring continual retraining and updating of industry personnel, including managers, engineers and executives, as well as decision-makers and policy-makers in a wide range of sectors;
Accelerating technological evolution and convergence that create uncertainty in identifying the skills and education future workers will need for the new jobs, services and industries.
Responses
Develop innovative programs, backed by first-class facilities, to fast-track the preparation of new generations for leadership and innovation and to offer retraining and updating for industry and government personnel;
Strengthen ties between industry and advanced education to give students hands-on experience and to enhance research and education opportunities for industry staff;
Identify technology trends in order to direct education and training resources effectively for future job creation, giving Canada�s economy a technological competitive advantage.
Approaches
Offer the innovative Master of Engineering in Telecommunications program;
Develop, in consultation with industry, innovative updating and retraining programs, specialized seminars and workshops;
Support initiatives to increase the number of highly qualified graduates in electrical and computer engineering;
Integrate results of strategic analysis of technology trends into education and training program development.
Communication Solutions
Industry Solutions
Nortel Education Communication Solutions
With Internet and multimedia technology playing an increasingly important role in education at every level, laying the right communications foundation is essential for educational establishments of all types.
At 1st Communications, we understand the communications and networking needs of your educational institution. Without voice and data communications technology, it would be impossible to operate in this day and age. You would not be able to construct collaborative projects, run intranets etc.
1st Communication's Nortel Solutions address the key issues for educational institutions, namely connectivity, mobility, security and advanced voice services. With our Nortel Solutions, you will be able to explore mobile and remote learning, introduce multimedia communications, take advantage of communication convergence and much, much more.
1st Communications uses the following Nortel Business Solutions and Nortel Technical Solutions to provide a complete service to the Education Sector:
Nortel Business Solutions
Increase your Productivity
Increase your Revenues
Streamline your Costs
Improve your Mobility
Increase Customer Loyalty, Care & Retention
Ease of Growth
Simplify your Administration
Protect your Investment
Get Greater Security
Nortel Technical Solutions
Converged Communications
Mobile Users
Contact Centres
Unified Communications
Computer Telephony Interaction
Interactive Voice Response
Teleworking
Wireless
Network Continuity

Nortel 922-101

922-101 exam :: Article by ArticleForgeTalks by using iamexamNo effect found, try new key phrase!Use audio getting to know for a transparent and more suitable figuring out of IT certification examination objectives against exam coaching. Use your MP3 Audio participant to pay attention and be mindful the examination ideas.We deliver audio exams in most regular audio structure MP3
STATE v. SHANK STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher S. SHANK.
No. 05-KA-421.     determined: February 14, 2006 Panel composed of Judges JAMES L. CANNELLA, MARION F. EDWARDS, and SAM A. LeBLANC, III, decide, seasoned Tempore.Paul D. Connick, Jr., District attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Thomas J. Butler, Martin Belanger, Roger Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, Gretna, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Christopher Shank, Angola, Louisiana, Defendant/Appellant. Margaret S. Sollars, Louisiana Appellate task, Thibodaux, Louisiana, for Defendant/Appellant. Defendant, Christopher Shank, appeals his conviction for aggravated rape. For the reasons that comply with, we confirm defendant's conviction and remand in an effort to appropriate mistakes patent on the face of the checklist.
Defendant, Christopher Shank, was indicted by means of a grand jury on October 9, 2003 and charged with aggravated rape in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:forty two. Shank firstly pled no longer responsible and then modified his plea to now not guilty due to madness. Shank later abandoned his madness defense. Shank proceeded to trial on October 27, 2004. After a two-day trial, he become found guilty as charged through a unanimous twelve-grownup jury. Shank became sentenced to existence imprisonment with out the improvement of parole, probation or suspension of sentence.
all the way through the early morning hours of August 9, 2003, Mr. D.1 became woke up by way of Shank knocking on his door. Shank had been dwelling with the D family for 2 to 3 months, and had been given a key to the apartment however misplaced it. Mr. D. let Shank into the condo and went lower back to mattress.
Mr. D. was awakened about one hour later when his youngest daughter came in and advised him that his godson had wet the mattress. Mr. D. took care of the matter and observed that his five-year-old daughter, D.D., changed into now not in her room. He requested his youngest daughter the place D.D. was, and he or she answered that D.D. turned into in Shank's room. Mr. D. regarded into Shank's room through a in part cracked door and saw what looked like Shank having sex with a person. Mr. D. pointed out Shank changed into beneath the covers, “on correct and simply humping.” Being half asleep, Mr. D. did not consider anything else about it.
He searched for D.D. in his bedroom, considering she may have crawled into bed along with his wife, however she become not there. He lower back to Shank's room and noticed Shank lying on his aspect cradling D.D. Mr. D. asked D.D. what she changed into doing, but she did not reply. He informed her to move back to her mattress, but she brought up she couldn't as a result of she become not donning panties. She defined that Shank had taken her panties off.
Mr. D. took D.D. to his wife at which time D.D. instructed her mom that Shank had pulled her panties off and touched her. according to Mrs. D, D.D. pointed out “she became rocking on [defendant] ․ like grown-usado.” Mrs. D checked out D.D.'s vagina and noticed blood. in the meantime, Mr. D. grabbed his gun, put it to Shank's head, and ordered him to depart. After a short scuffle, Shank left.
The police arrived shortly after Mr. D. called them. They seized D.D.'s nightgown and the bedding, which later validated bad for seminal fluids. D.D.'s panties had been by no means discovered. D.D. became taken to children's sanatorium, the place a rape examination was performed with the aid of Dr. Adrienne Atzemis. Dr. Atzemis testified D.D. had a small laceration of the posterior forchette, which changed into in line with penile/vaginal contact. besides the fact that children, Dr. Atzemis admitted the laceration was non-selected for sexual abuse because it might have been led to with the aid of different capability.
At trial, D.D. testified she had gone into Shank's room to get some water. She cited she tried going to her mom first however her mother's door was locked and she or he did not wake up when D.D. knocked. When she went into Shank's room, he picked her up and put her into his mattress. D.D. pointed out that Shank pulled her panties down and started “shaking in all places” her. D.D. explained she become lying on her lower back and Shank changed into kneeling over her. She mentioned Shank turned into shaking tough and “it truly was hurting an awful lot” on her inner most part, the front part of her bottom. She cited she felt Shank's inner most part go into her inner most part. D.D. testified her father came into the room, picked her up off the bed, and carried her to her mom's room. She informed her father and mother that Shank had pulled her panties down and “touched her butt.”
Shank changed into because of this arrested. After his arrest, Sergeant Gary cook, a supervisor in the special Investigations Unit at the Jefferson Parish Correctional middle, was advised by the health functions administrator, Nurse Miriam Schultz, that Shank may well be suicidal and she or he had concerns for Shank's safety. Sergeant prepare dinner approached Shank to assess his protection possibility, at which time Shank told him he did not are looking to be alone along with his options due to the fact that what he had completed to the sufferer. in response to Sergeant prepare dinner, Shank proceeded to explain he had been on drugs and thought he was having intercourse with his girlfriend however changed into awakened through someone asserting, “What are you doing, Uncle Chris?”
At trial, Shank testified he had taken eight Oxycontin capsules the nighttime of the incident. He mentioned he became in dangerous shape when he returned to the D family unit's domestic. He claimed he didn't know D.D. become in his mattress unless Mr. D. grew to become on the mild and asked D.D. what she became doing. Shank denied knowingly having sex with D.D.
in their second assignment of error, each protection information and defendant, professional se, argue the facts was inadequate to convict defendant of aggravated rape.2 defense advice contends the scientific facts turned into inconclusive and the testimony changed into unreliable. whereas Shank admits a sexual battery occurred, he argues the proof fails to display a rape took place. He relies on the testimony of the inspecting doctor who cited she couldn't say with clinical certainty there changed into penile contact. He additionally elements to the shortcoming of seminal fluid found right through the rape exam and on the sufferer's nightgown. Shank additional maintains the victim by no means alleged anything else more than the truth he touched her butt until she testified at trial, at which period she brought up defendant's private half went interior her inner most half. Shank asserts the six-year-ancient victim 3 become coached earlier than trial. pro se, Shank extra keeps he did not have the requisite intent to have intercourse with the sufferer seeing that he changed into asleep throughout the act.
The State responds that definitive physical facts is not required to sustain an aggravated rape conviction and asserts the sufferer's testimony alone is sufficient to uphold the conviction.
The commonplace of assessment for the sufficiency of the evidence to uphold a conviction is whether, viewing the evidence within the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of truth could conclude that the State proved the primary facets of the crime past an inexpensive doubt.four
Defendant turned into convicted of aggravated rape in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:42, which, on the time of the offense, offered in pertinent part:
A. Aggravated rape is a rape dedicated upon an individual sixty-5 years of age or older or where the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual activity is deemed to be without lawful consent of the victim because it is dedicated beneath any one or extra of here cases:
․
(4) When the sufferer is under the age of twelve years.5 Lack of potential of the sufferer's age shall now not be a defense.
Rape is described by means of LSA-R.S. 14:41 as follows:
A. Rape is the act of anal, oral, or vaginal sexual activity with a male or female adult committed with out the person's lawful consent.
B. Emission is not integral and any sexual penetration, vaginal or anal, besides the fact that children slight is sufficient to finished the crime.
“within the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical proof, one witness' testimony, if believed through the trier-of-fact, is satisfactory support for a requisite factual conclusion.” 6 With sexual offenses, the sufferer's testimony alone may also be sufficient to set up the facets of a sexual offense, even if the State does not introduce scientific, scientific or physical evidence to show the fee of the offense.7
Shank first contends the medical proof didn't prove penile/vaginal contact. He asserts the serology checks had been poor for seminal fluid on the victim's nightgown and in her rape package. He points out that no pubic hairs have been found all through the sufferer's rape equipment examination. He additional depends on Dr. Atzemis' testimony all over which she stated she couldn't say with clinical sure bet that penile contact brought about the laceration to the victim's posterior forchette, a local in the vagina.
The checklist suggests that Dr. Atzemis carried out a rape kit examination on the victim. just before the actual examination, she took a history from the sufferer. The victim advised Dr. Atzemis that Shank had taken her panties off and touched her butt with his hand. Dr. Atzemis' actual examination revealed a small laceration to the sufferer's posterior forchette. She pointed out this sort of laceration turned into in keeping with a five year historic who had penile/vaginal contact. Dr. Atzemis admitted the laceration become non-specific for sexual abuse because there are motives, other than sexual contact, that may end up in this kind of laceration, including unintended damage and scraping the area with a fingernail. D.D. and her mom both denied the victim had an issue or habit scratching herself in the deepest enviornment. Dr. Atzemis extra testified she has seen circumstances where there's full penetration with none resulting harm.
At trial, D.D. testified she went into Shank's room to ask him to get her something to drink. She mentioned the Shank picked her up, put her in his bed, pulled her panties down, and began “shaking” everywhere her. She defined that Shank's shorts were off when he become “shaking” on her. She further defined she changed into lying on her returned on the bed and Shank was kneeling over her. She testified that Shank's private half went into her private part when he turned into “shaking.”
Three days after the incident, D.D. changed into interviewed through Omalee Gordon on the baby Advocacy core (CAC). The interview changed into videotaped and the videotape was played for the jury. in the videotaped interview, D.D. explained the incident in additional detail. She pointed out that Shank became naked when he pulled her into bed with him and that he pushed up her clothing, took off her panties, and touched her butt. D.D. brought up that Shank took his “birdie” and shook it on her which became how she bought a cut on her “tu tu”. the usage of dolls, D.D. indicated defendant's “birdie” was in his groin enviornment and her “tu tu” was in her vaginal enviornment. When asked to clarify how Shank shook his “birdie” on her, D.D. established a rhythmic entrance to again action with her hips. She brought up she became mendacity on her again while Shank knelt over her and “shook” on her. She explained he “shook” his “birdie” on each the backyard and inner of her “tu tu.” D.D. additional mentioned Shank saved kissing her “like in case you're in love” and “like you're married.” She then validated an opened-mouth kiss.
apart from difficult the scientific evidence as inconclusive, Shank challenges the reliability of the testimony. He claims D.D.'s testimony changed into inconsistent as a result of she not ever claimed the rest more than him touching her butt unless she testified at trial. Shank's fact is wrong. As noted above, during the CAC interview, D.D. mentioned Shank's “birdie” (which she indicated became his penis) touched each the internal and outside of her “tu tu” (which she indicated become her vagina).
It is not the function of the appellate court docket to verify the credibility determinations of the trier of truth or to reweigh the facts.8 “The trier of fact shall consider the witnesses' credibility, and when faced with a battle in testimony, is free to settle for or reject, in total or in part, the testimony of any witness.” 9
In State v. Turner,10 the defendant contended the evidence become inadequate to support the jury's verdict of aggravated rape since the simplest facts of rape was the sufferer's miraculous testimony. youngsters, this courtroom considered that, from the date of the incident, the sufferer constantly maintained the defendant raped her and the particulars of the incident have been constant when she instructed her mother, the law enforcement officials, the doctors, and in her taped commentary.11 After acknowledging that the jury made a credibility judgment through believing the victim's edition of the hobbies over the defendant's edition, this courtroom decided that the State proved the elementary features of the crime past a reasonable doubt.12
In State v. Hubbard,13 this courtroom discovered the sufferer's testimony by myself turned into sufficient to uphold defendant's conviction for aggravated rape. The concern in Hubbard was the sufficiency of proof that there become sexual penetration. The victim testified that defendant made her “have sex” with him. She affirmatively answered a query of whether defendant raped her. This court docket decided this to be adequate facts to show penetration. This courtroom noted that the testimony of the victim on my own, unsubstantiated by way of physical facts, is satisfactory to assist a conviction of rape.
during this case, D.D. become five years old at the time of the incident. She brought up Shank took off her panties and “shook” his “birdie” in and on her “tu tu” which caused a cut. D.D.'s mother and father both testified that D.D. instructed them Shank had taken off her panties. based on her mother's testimony, D.D. told her Shank had touched her and that she “changed into rocking on him ․ like grown united states of americado.” Mrs. D checked out D.D.'s vagina and cited it become pink and swollen. She also noticed blood. D.D.'s father testified he accompanied Shank “on right and simply humping” like he was having intercourse with someone. Dr. Atzemis testified D.D. had a laceration to her posterior forchette, which turned into in keeping with penile/vaginal contact. despite the fact Dr. Atzemis cited D.D. simplest claimed Shank touched her along with his hand, she explained it is not strange for a toddler no longer to supply full disclosure no matter if it's brought on by the baby's consolation level or even if the newborn knows the significance of certain particulars.
moreover, in keeping with Sergeant Gary prepare dinner, Shank brought up he had been on drugs and notion he was having sex with his lady friend at the time. once defendant realized it changed into D.D., he grabbed her and instructed her he turned into sorry. Shank additionally told Sergeant cook dinner he changed into afraid he had damage D.D. He additional mentioned he became now a child molester. a different State witness, Russell Buras, testified he became within the telephone next to Shank for 3 days. Mr. Buras pointed out he had numerous conversations with Shank and that Shank admitted fondling and penetrating D.D.
although Shank denied he made these statements to Sgt. prepare dinner and Mr. Buras, the jury discovered D.D. and the different State witnesses to be credible, a discovering which is supported via the record. After viewing the facts in a light most favorable to the prosecution, we hold that a rational trier of fact might have found, past an affordable doubt, that the facts changed into satisfactory to help defendant's conviction for aggravated rape.
Shank's claim that he did not knowingly have intercourse with the victim because he turned into asleep is of no end result. Aggravated rape is a regular intent crime and, therefore, the simplest intent critical to sustain a conviction is based by way of the very doing of the proscribed acts.14
In Shank's first professional se task of error, and within the first assignment of error by his protection counsel, it's argued that Shank's statements, one to Sgt. prepare dinner and one to Russell Buras, should had been suppressed. Shank contends his statement to Sgt. prepare dinner was acquired in violation of his Miranda15 rights and, thus, constituted an involuntary confession. He keeps his commentary to Russell Buras was bought in violation of his appropriate to guidance because Mr. Buras turned into a paid informant and was deliberately used by means of the police to result in an incriminating commentary from Shank outdoor his advice's presence. Shank additionally asserts his observation to Mr. Buras may still were suppressed because its existence turned into no longer well timed disclosed.
involving Shank's remark to Sgt. cook dinner, the State contends there become no Miranda violation since the commentary become spontaneous and never made throughout an interrogation. As for the admissibility of defendant's commentary to Mr. Buras, the State argues the situation turned into not preserved for enchantment because it became not ever the area of a movement to suppress and Shank on no account objected to the admissibility of the commentary made to Mr. Buras.
earlier than a confession will also be added into facts, the State has the burden of affirmatively proving it was freely and voluntarily given, and became not made below the have an effect on of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or guarantees. LSA-R.S. 15:451. It need to even be based that an accused who makes a confession all the way through custodial interrogation became first suggested of his Miranda rights.sixteen
“Spontaneous and voluntary statements no longer given as a result of police interrogation or compelling have an effect on, are admissible in proof with out Miranda warnings, however the defendant is in custody.” 17 cops don't seem to be obliged to ignore spontaneous and unsolicited statements through somebody in custody, as long as the statements don't result from police-initiated custodial interrogation or questioning “moderately prone to elicit an incriminating response.” 18
The voluntariness of an announcement is to be decided on a case-by way of-case groundwork. The trial choose's conclusions related to the credibility and weight of the testimony concerning the voluntariness of a press release or confession should not overturned except they aren't supported via the facts.19
The list doesn't comprise a written motion to suppress. youngsters, there is a transcript of a March 30, 2004 listening to on a motion to suppress defendant's remark made to Sgt. cook dinner. right through the March 30 listening to, Sgt. cook dinner changed into the handiest witness to testify. He mentioned he's the supervisor of the particular Investigative Unit at the Jefferson Parish Correctional core and is in can charge of protection matters within the penal complex.
Sgt. cook dinner testified that he interviewed Shank on August 15, 2003 after he become informed by using the scientific director, Nurse Miriam Schultz, that Shank changed into in intake booking, became totally agitated, and was dealing with a major cost. She recommended Sgt. cook she changed into given that putting him on a suicide watch as a result of she thought Shank can be unhealthy to himself or others. At trial, Nurse Schultz testified she contacted Sgt. prepare dinner as a result of she became very involved about Shank, as a result of certain inmates may also be prone within the customary population of the penal complex.20 Sgt. cook dinner explained he went to check with Shank to verify his protection possibility.
Sgt. prepare dinner, along with two different deputies, eliminated Shank from housing and brought him to the visitation tank for privacy explanations. He asked Shank what complications he turned into having. Sgt. cook dinner principally informed Shank that he changed into not advising him of his rights, that he become not asking him about his case or can charge, and that he became no longer drawn to speaking about his case or can charge. Shank proceeded to inform Sgt. prepare dinner he become upset, that he did not are looking to be in the housing area where he was assigned, that he did not are looking to be by myself together with his innovations dealing with the can charge he became dealing with. Sgt. prepare dinner warned Shank once again no longer to talk about his case. having said that, Shank went on to explain to Sgt. cook that he had been below the have an impact on of Oxycontin, heroin, and Xanbars and became handed out in his bed. Shank mentioned he concept he was lying next to his lady friend, rolled over on desirable of her, after which heard the victim say, “what are you doing Uncle Chris?” Shank advised Sgt. cook he's now a child molester.
Sgt. cook testified he warned Shank a couple of instances that he changed into now not there to speak to Shank concerning the incident. After Shank gave his commentary, Sgt. cook dinner did not ask any comply with up or clarifying questions. He mentioned he had no competencies of the case and was no longer assigned to investigate it.
in accordance with the facts introduced, it seems that Shank's observation to Sgt. cook became made voluntarily and spontaneously, and never in accordance with an interrogation. In State v. Sanders,21 the Louisiana Supreme court docket decided defendant's remark to an FBI agent changed into admissible despite defendant's request for an attorney and to stay silent. The supreme court docket explained “interrogation” below Miranda is limited to those instances where the words or moves of the police are “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.” 22 The supreme court docket cited the FBI agent persevered to ask questions but simplest as to “movements heritage” concerns equivalent to age and marital fame. The supreme court concluded the FBI agent's questioning about “administrative matters would not have led defendant to conclude the police sought an inculpatory statement.” 23
within the current case, Sgt. cook puzzled defendant about how he was doing within the context of assessing his security chance within the detention center. He warned Shank a few times not to focus on his case and stated he turned into now not interested in defendant's case or charge. seeing that the context of the stumble upon, there became no investigating interrogation that required defendant be advised of his Miranda rights. Defendant's observation to Sgt. cook dinner was voluntary and spontaneous. hence, we find that the trial court didn't err in denying the movement to suppress.
involving the admissibility of defendant's remark to Russell Buras, the State is relevant in its statement that the depend become now not preserved for enchantment. The listing suggests that the day earlier than trial, the State filed a note of its intent to use defendant's statement to Russell Buras. The be counted turned into delivered to defendant's attention all the way through a listening to in open courtroom on October 26, 2004. Shank made no objections. On the second day of trial, the State called Russell Buras to testify. once again, there become no objection by defendant. all over Mr. Buras' testimony, Shank lodged one objection on the foundation Mr. Buras' testimony circumvented defendant's right to testify. The objection became overruled via the trial court. At no time did Shank object to the admissibility of Mr. Buras' testimony on the groundwork that it violated his correct to tips, or became prejudicial because of delayed disclosure.
to be able to retain an argument for appeal, a celebration must make a contemporaneous objection. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841(A) gives, partially, that “[a]n irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict until it become objected to at the time of incidence.” The aim behind the contemporaneous objection rule is to put the trial choose on note of an alleged irregularity so that he might also treatment the issue and to evade the defendant from playing for a favorable verdict after which resorting to enchantment on blunders that may were with no trouble corrected via an objection.24
A contemporaneous objection to the court docket's ruling on a written action is frequently now not required. LSA-C.Cr.P. paintings. 841(B). despite the fact, there is not any indication within the record that defendant's statement to Russell Buras become ever made a part of defendant's motion to suppress. moreover, Shank under no circumstances argued to the trial courtroom that his correct to counsel turned into violated by means of Russell Buras. He raises this concern for the first time on enchantment. a new subject cannot be raised for the primary time on attraction.25 therefore, as that component of defendant's project of error concerning the admissibility of his statement to Russell Buras become not preserved for appeal, we can decline to trust it.
The listing become reviewed for blunders patent, in accordance with LSA-C.Cr.P. artwork. 920; State v. Oliveaux,26 and State v. Weiland.27 here matters are cited.
First, the trial courtroom did not thoroughly inform Shank of the prescriptive duration for submitting post-conviction relief pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 930.eight. After sentencing, the trial courtroom cited that defendant had “two (2) years from the date this conviction becomes closing to are searching for put up-conviction relief.” This court docket has held that the failure to propose defendant that the prescriptive length runs from the time his conviction and sentence become last renders the advisal incomplete.28 for this reason, we remand with an order that the trial court thoroughly inform defendant of the time from which prescription for publish-conviction aid runs, by using sending written observe of such to defendant inside ten days of the rendition of the appellate opinion, and to file written proof that defendant received the note in the listing.29
2nd, the checklist doesn't reflect that defendant was notified of the sex culprit registration requirements. Defendant's conviction is defined as a intercourse offense via LSA-R.S. 15:541(14.1). LSA-R.S. 15:540, et seq. requires registration of sex offenders. additional, LSA-R.S. 15:543(A) requires the court to inform a defendant of the registration requirements as follows: “The court docket shall deliver written notification to any defendant charged with a intercourse offense of the registration requirements of R.S. 15:542. Such observe will likely be included on any responsible plea forms and judgment and sentence varieties supplied to the defendant.”
This court docket has held that the trial court's failure to provide this notification constitutes an error patent and warrants a remand for written notification.30 We, for this reason, order the trial court docket to notify the defendant of the registration requirements of LSA-R.S. 15:543(A) by using sending written be aware to the defendant inside ten days of this court's opinion, and to file written proof in the checklist that the defendant acquired the be aware.31
For the foregoing causes, the defendant's conviction is affirmed, and we remand to be able to appropriate mistakes patent on the face of the record.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED.
FOOTNOTES
1.   The victim and her family are identified by means of initials with a purpose to protect her identification. See, LSA-R.S. 46:1844(W)(three).
2.   it's mentioned that defendant didn't file a motion for put up-verdict judgment of acquittal pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 821. youngsters, this failure doesn't forestall appellate overview of the sufficiency of the facts. State v. Washington, 421 So.2nd 887, 889 (La.1982); State v. Carey, 04-1073 (La.App. 5 Cir.three/29/05), 901 So.2nd 509, 512, fn. 4.
3.   The sufferer was five years old at the time of the alleged rape but six years ancient at the time of trial.
4.   Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, sixty one L.Ed.second 560 (1979).
5.   constructive August 15, 2003, Acts 2003, No. 795, § 1 substituted “thirteen years” for “twelve years” in paragraph (A)(four).
6.   State v. Turner, 05-75 (La.App. 5 Cir.5/31/05), 904 So.second 816, 823 (citing State v. Robinson, 02-1869 (La.4/14/04), 874 So.2d 66, seventy nine, cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1023, a hundred twenty five S.Ct. 658, one hundred sixty L.Ed.2nd 499 (2004)).
7.   State v. Turner, supra (citing State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App. 5 Cir.eleven/10/ninety nine), 750 So.2nd 1036, 1045, writs denied, 99-3477 (La.6/30/00), 765 So.2d 1062, and 00-0150 (La.6/30/00), 765 So.2nd 1066).
8.   State v. Carter, ninety eight-24 (La.App. 5 Cir.5/27/ninety eight), 712 So.2nd 701, 708, writ denied, ninety eight-1767 (La.eleven/6/ninety eight), 727 So.2nd 444 (citations overlooked).
9.   State v. Crawford, 03-1494 (La.App. 5 Cir.4/27/04), 873 So.2nd 768, 786, writ denied, 04-1744 (La.5/6/05), 901 So.2d 1083 (quotation omitted).
10.   05-seventy five (La.App. 5 Cir.5/31/05), 904 So.2d 816, 821.
eleven.   identification. at 823.
12.   id.
13.   97-916 (La.App. 5 Cir.1/27/ninety eight), 708 So.second 1099, 1103-1104, writ denied, 98-0643 (La.eight/28/ninety eight), 723 So.2d 415,
14.   State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.four/3/01), 803 So.2d 916, 923.
15.   Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2nd 694 (1966).
16.   State v. Williams, 04-697 (La.App. 5 Cir.eleven/30/04), 889 So.2nd 1135, 1142-1143, writ denied, 05-0395 (La.5/13/05), 902 So.2d 1017.
17.   identity. at 1143 (quoting State v. Castillo, 389 So.2nd 1307, 1310 (La.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922, 101 S.Ct. 3159, sixty nine L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981)).
18.   State v. Ross, ninety five-1798 (La.3/8/96), 669 So.2d 384, 386.
19.   State v. Williams, supra, at 1143.
20.   In reviewing the trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, proof presented at trial may well be considered apart from the facts offered on the listening to on the motion to suppress. State v. Fasola, 04-902 (La.App. 5 Cir.3/29/05), 901 So.2d 533, 541.
21.   ninety three-0001 (La.eleven/30/94), 648 So.second 1272, 1282-1283, cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1246, 116 S.Ct. 2504, one hundred thirty five L.Ed.2d 194 (1996).
22.   identification. at 1282 (quoting State v. Abadie, 612 So.second 1 (La.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 816, 114 S.Ct. sixty six, 126 L.Ed.2nd 35 (1993)).
23.   State v. Sanders, supra, at 1283.
24.   State v. Brown, 01-a hundred and sixty (La.App. 5 Cir.5/30/01), 788 So.2d 667, 673.
25.   State v. Merritt, 04-204 (La.App. 5 Cir.6/29/04), 877 So.2d 1079, 1082, writ denied, 04-1849 (La.eleven/24/04), 888 So.2nd 228.
26.   312 So.2nd 337 (La.1975).
27.   556 So.2nd 175 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990).
28.   State v. supply, 04-341 (La.App. 5 Cir.10/26/04), 887 So.second 596, 598.
29.   id.
30.   See, State v. Stevenson, 00-1296 (La.App. 5 Cir.1/30/01), 778 So.2d 1165, 1166-1167.
31.   This court docket has not made a distinction between those defendants with existence sentences and those that have acquired less than lifestyles sentences for functions of the mandatory written be aware of LSA-R.S. 15:543. See, State v. Simmons, 03-20 (La.App. 5 Cir.4/29/03), 845 So.2d 1249; State v. Dickerson, 01-1287 (La.App. 5 Cir.6/26/02), 822 So.2nd 849, 859, writ denied, 02-2108 (La.2/21/03), 837 So.2nd 627; State v. Wallace, 00-1745 (La.App. 5 Cir.5/sixteen/01), 788 So.second 578, 588, writ denied, 01-1849 (La.5/24/02), 816 So.2d 297.
MARION F. EDWARDS, judge.

Ct 3158 69 l ed 2nd 1004 1981 the exclusion ofCt. 3158 sixty nine L. Ed. 2nd 1004 (1981). The exclusion of militia retirement pay from divis- ible marital property on no account precludes a trial court from because such an asset when selecting an appropriate amount for preservation and assist; if upkeep is applicable, the earnings will be avail- in a position to fulfill an affordable award, above all if there are few other assets or materials to be divided. Russell v. Russell, 605 S.W.2d 33 (Ky. Ct. App. 1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922, one hundred and one S. Ct. 3158, sixty nine L. Ed. 2d 1004 (1981). Pursuant to 10 u.s.a.C. § 1408(a)(four), amounts waived as a way to receive disability compensation, or VA benefits bought in lieu of militia retirement pay, are specially excluded from division as marital prop- erty; although, if an inequity arises in someone case, the trial court can unravel the problem by using making an acceptable award of spousal aid and/or marital property. Davis v. Davis, 777 S.W.2d 230 (Ky. 1989). 17. knowledgeable diploma. Award of $10,000 in lump-sum protection changed into both reasonable and authorized by way of this part where wife had supported husband whereas he received skilled degree, where her earnings would no longer permit her to savour the rest drawing near the normal of living which she loved as wife, where the courtroom took into account hus- band’s indebtedness for academic loans, the undeniable fact that spouse had remarried and became accordingly not entitled to peri- odic protection, and the indisputable fact that, whereas husband could not have matriculated devoid of the wife’s help and information, her contributions would no longer drastically inure to his direct monetary enhancement and where the court docket ordered husband to pay baby assist, all of child’s scientific and dental fees, and $1,500 of spouse’s attorney’s costs. McGowan v. McGowan, 663 S.W.2nd 219 (Ky. Ct. App. 1983). A spouse who has labored and financially contributed to the other companion’s acquisition of a pro- fessional diploma may still not automatically receive a financial award in keeping with a prescribed method; the dissolution of marriage statutes effortlessly do not authorize trial courts to make such an award. McGowan v. McGowan, 663 S.W.second 219 (Ky. Ct. App. 1983). In circumstances the place a divorcing couple might also have begun to benefit from the fruits of increased revenue because of knowledgeable companion’s degree, a court can, under this part, competently agree with the have an impact on of a divorce on the nonprofessional better half’s usual of residing and, if the courtroom finds that the nonprofessional companion are not in a position to keep a standard of residing moderately similar to the one enjoyed all through the wedding and that the professional significant other can manage to pay for it, an award of main- tenance to complement the nonprofessional better half’s profits can be appropriate; this could be especially true in these instances where there's little or no marital property to divide on the grounds that via an award of mainte- nance, the court docket might be justifiably allowing the nonprofessional significant other to recoup most of his or her investment in the other significant other’s skilled diploma.

Gender impartial baby shower1000+ images about Miscellaneous on Pinterest | Gender impartial baby shower, baby showers and NursesForwardForwardForwardForwardForwardForwardForwardForwardForwardForward Strawberry Brownie Skewers

These strawberry brownie skewers are a pretty good single serving dessert! Make them for a summer season barbecue or picnic, and even simply as a simple weeknight dessert!

See greater 1
Strawberry Brownie Skewers

onelittleproject.com

Loaded Baked Potato Salad

See extra Loaded Baked Potato Salad | Six Sisters' Stuff

sixsistersstuff.com

questions to ask an interviewer during the job interview.

See extra Bob Feldman on Twitter

twitter.com

Nurse resume templates | clinical resumes | Resume templates specifically designed for the nursing career!

See greater forty five Nursing quotes to encourage You to Greatness

Be-The-class-of-Nurse-you would-want-To-Work-With-2- if most effective all nurses would deal with each and every different this manner.

See more forty five Nursing prices to encourage You to Greatness - Nurseslabs

nurseslabs.com

Order of Draw Poster

See greater Order of Draw Poster

phlebotomy.com

Beaverbrook, Corn, Spinach, and Ranch Pasta Salad

A bowtie pasta salad loaded with parts no one can resist.

See greater 1st Baron Beaverbrook, Corn, Spinach, and Ranch Pasta Salad

delish.com

sluggish Cooker sweet Spicy Meatballs

These gradual cooker sweet spicy meatballs are the excellent mix of sweet and spicy. Add them to your tailgating and birthday celebration menus nowadays! | honeyandbirch.com

See more Pinned from

honeyandbirch.com

sluggish Cooker Honey Garlic Meatballs

easy slow cooker honey garlic meatballs

See more 1
Pinned from

fabulesslyfrugal.com

The most effective Resume Cheat Sheet you'll Ever need: Is putting your resume together making you query if you should practice for a job? under no circumstances fear, we now have everything you deserve to find out about creating the superb resume. which you could thank us later.

See extra The simplest Resume Cheat Sheet you are going to Ever need

businessnewsdaily.com

3fb3a3135da210bf1bab743d92ca7542

constructive Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear drugs: A Catalog 1 you are the use of an old-fashioned version of Chrome which is not supported through ResearchGate anymore. For a sooner, safer browsing event, upgrade your browser now. entry content material on ResearchGate
entry content on ResearchGate

References:

Search This Blog

killexams brain dumps

Don't Miss these Nortel 922-101 Dumps